GlassDex › Token safety › $MCF
Is $MCF safe? GlassDex scan
Risky Monaco Capital Frank · Solana
$MCF scans Risky on GlassDex. Main reasons: Large Amount of LP Unlocked; Low Liquidity.
Updated · data: Jupiter, DEX Screener, RugCheck
Open live chart & full scanKey facts
| Safety verdict | Risky |
|---|---|
| Mint authority | Revoked (supply fixed) |
| Freeze authority | Revoked |
| LP burn / lock (RugCheck) | 0% burned or locked |
| Top 10 holders | 63.3% of supply |
| Dev history | First token from this creator |
| Liquidity (all pools) | — |
| Market cap | — |
| Price | — |
| 24h change | — |
| Holders | 12 |
| Age | 107 days |
| Contract | 33r46gDzoXfYijXWS4JgWcUcPWbTGphBnJGnApW77fsX |
Flags found
- 🔴 Large Amount of LP Unlocked
- 🟡 High market cap per holder
- 🔴 Low Liquidity
- 🟡 Single holder ownership
- 🟡 High holder concentration
- 🟡 Low amount of LP Providers
- 🟡 Fee config enabled
- 🟡 Mutable metadata
- 🟡 Top 10 wallets hold 63%
- 🟡 Only 0% of LP burned or locked
Questions
Is $MCF safe?
$MCF scans Risky on GlassDex. Main reasons: Large Amount of LP Unlocked; Low Liquidity. Just a scan tool, not financial advice.
Can the $MCF developer mint more tokens or freeze wallets?
Mint authority: Revoked (supply fixed). Freeze authority: Revoked.
Is the $MCF liquidity burned or locked?
LP: 0% burned or locked. Liquidity is about — across all pools.
How concentrated are $MCF holders?
The top 10 wallets hold 63.3% of supply. Over 50% is a concentration warning.
What is the $MCF contract address?
33r46gDzoXfYijXWS4JgWcUcPWbTGphBnJGnApW77fsX on Solana.
Learn more
- How to check if a Solana token is a rug
- Mint and freeze authority
- LP burn vs lock
- How to read top holders
Just a scan tool, not financial advice.